<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 224 - ITAT JABALPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421964</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals and cross objections for statistical purposes, partially allowing the cross objection for AY 2009-10. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on the provision for bad and doubtful debts but found that the provision for overdue interest was not admissible under section 43D for the relevant years. The reassessment proceedings for AY 2009-10 were found to be valid based on the provision for overdue interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 May 2022 14:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678179" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 224 - ITAT JABALPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421964</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals and cross objections for statistical purposes, partially allowing the cross objection for AY 2009-10. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on the provision for bad and doubtful debts but found that the provision for overdue interest was not admissible under section 43D for the relevant years. The reassessment proceedings for AY 2009-10 were found to be valid based on the provision for overdue interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421964</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>