<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 203 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , BENGALURU BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421943</link>
    <description>Rental or lease dues for immovable office space were treated as not falling within &quot;operational debt&quot; under Section 5(21) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, because they do not arise from the provision of goods, services, employment, or a statutory debt owed to the Government or local authority. The Tribunal noted conflicting appellate views but followed the later binding view rejecting rent-based claims as operational debt. On that basis, the rental arrears could not support a Section 9 insolvency petition, and the claim was held outside the Code&#039;s operational debt framework, leaving other remedies available in law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 May 2022 08:34:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678153" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 203 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , BENGALURU BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421943</link>
      <description>Rental or lease dues for immovable office space were treated as not falling within &quot;operational debt&quot; under Section 5(21) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, because they do not arise from the provision of goods, services, employment, or a statutory debt owed to the Government or local authority. The Tribunal noted conflicting appellate views but followed the later binding view rejecting rent-based claims as operational debt. On that basis, the rental arrears could not support a Section 9 insolvency petition, and the claim was held outside the Code&#039;s operational debt framework, leaving other remedies available in law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421943</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>