<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 203 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , BENGALURU BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421943</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that rental dues do not constitute &#039;Operational Debt&#039; under Section 5(21) of the IBC, 2016. The Company Petition seeking Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process was dismissed, permitting the Petitioner to explore other legal options. The decision was influenced by the interpretation of the &#039;Promila Taneja&#039; case, determining that rental dues from office space use do not fall under operational debt.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 May 2022 08:34:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678153" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 203 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , BENGALURU BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421943</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that rental dues do not constitute &#039;Operational Debt&#039; under Section 5(21) of the IBC, 2016. The Company Petition seeking Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process was dismissed, permitting the Petitioner to explore other legal options. The decision was influenced by the interpretation of the &#039;Promila Taneja&#039; case, determining that rental dues from office space use do not fall under operational debt.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421943</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>