<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 200 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421940</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, ruling that goods in packages weighing more than 25 kg are not subject to duty under Section 4A solely because they are sold through channel partners. The differential duty demand on this count was set aside. However, any other demands within the normal period were confirmed, and the penalty was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 May 2022 12:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678149" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 200 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421940</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, ruling that goods in packages weighing more than 25 kg are not subject to duty under Section 4A solely because they are sold through channel partners. The differential duty demand on this count was set aside. However, any other demands within the normal period were confirmed, and the penalty was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>