<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 199 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421939</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition due to unexplained delay, availability of alternate remedy under Section 51 of TNVAT Act, and petitioner&#039;s failure to utilize opportunities provided, including personal hearing. The court emphasized adherence to principles like JKM Graphics and the importance of actively participating in the process. The petition was deemed unfit for interference in writ jurisdiction and was consequently dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2022 12:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678148" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 199 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421939</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition due to unexplained delay, availability of alternate remedy under Section 51 of TNVAT Act, and petitioner&#039;s failure to utilize opportunities provided, including personal hearing. The court emphasized adherence to principles like JKM Graphics and the importance of actively participating in the process. The petition was deemed unfit for interference in writ jurisdiction and was consequently dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421939</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>