https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421936 The court upheld the summoning order dated 9.6.2000 under Section 138 N.I. Act and 420 I.P.C, dismissing the application to quash it under Section 482 Cr.P.C. The court found that the cheque was dishonored due to insufficiency of funds, rejecting the applicant's arguments regarding alterations and lack of mention in the legal notice. Referring to legal precedents, the court emphasized the need to establish a prima facie case at this stage and concluded that the application lacked merit, affirming the summoning order. en-us Tue, 26 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 May 2022 16:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421936 The court upheld the summoning order dated 9.6.2000 under Section 138 N.I. Act and 420 I.P.C, dismissing the application to quash it under Section 482 Cr.P.C. The court found that the cheque was dishonored due to insufficiency of funds, rejecting the applicant's arguments regarding alterations and lack of mention in the legal notice. Referring to legal precedents, the court emphasized the need to establish a prima facie case at this stage and concluded that the application lacked merit, affirming the summoning order. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 26 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421936