https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421936 Inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC is not exercised where the complaint and supporting material disclose a prima facie case and the defence requires trial-based factual adjudication. On the cheque dishonour complaint, the court found the complaint, Sections 200 and 202 statements, and bank memo showed sufficient material, including more than one reason for dishonour and insufficiency of funds, so the objections were matters for trial. The challenge to the Section 420 IPC allegation was also not specifically pressed. The proceedings were therefore not treated as an abuse of process, and quashing was declined. en-us Tue, 26 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 May 2022 16:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421936 Inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC is not exercised where the complaint and supporting material disclose a prima facie case and the defence requires trial-based factual adjudication. On the cheque dishonour complaint, the court found the complaint, Sections 200 and 202 statements, and bank memo showed sufficient material, including more than one reason for dishonour and insufficiency of funds, so the objections were matters for trial. The challenge to the Section 420 IPC allegation was also not specifically pressed. The proceedings were therefore not treated as an abuse of process, and quashing was declined. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 26 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421936