https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421935 The petitioner was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonored cheques. Despite claiming misuse of cheques, her defense was deemed improbable by the Trial Court and upheld by the Appellate Court. The court emphasized that factual findings cannot be disturbed without merit. The petitioner's plea for release under Section 428 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was rejected as the default sentence was consecutive, making her ineligible for the benefit. All revision petitions were dismissed for lack of merit, and related applications were disposed of accordingly. en-us Fri, 14 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 May 2022 08:33:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421935 The petitioner was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonored cheques. Despite claiming misuse of cheques, her defense was deemed improbable by the Trial Court and upheld by the Appellate Court. The court emphasized that factual findings cannot be disturbed without merit. The petitioner's plea for release under Section 428 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was rejected as the default sentence was consecutive, making her ineligible for the benefit. All revision petitions were dismissed for lack of merit, and related applications were disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 14 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421935