<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 188 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421928</link>
    <description>Interest earned by a co-operative credit society from bank deposits was treated as income attributable to the society&#039;s business and held eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i), following binding precedent; the deduction on interest income was allowed. Insurance commission receipts were not finally decided on merits because the Tribunal found the first appellate authority had not properly examined the assessee&#039;s business-characterisation plea, so the matter was remanded. The claim for deduction under section 80P(2)(c) was also restored for fresh adjudication, as the record did not clearly show how the claim had arisen and earlier adjudication was incomplete.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 May 2022 08:33:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678135" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 188 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421928</link>
      <description>Interest earned by a co-operative credit society from bank deposits was treated as income attributable to the society&#039;s business and held eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i), following binding precedent; the deduction on interest income was allowed. Insurance commission receipts were not finally decided on merits because the Tribunal found the first appellate authority had not properly examined the assessee&#039;s business-characterisation plea, so the matter was remanded. The claim for deduction under section 80P(2)(c) was also restored for fresh adjudication, as the record did not clearly show how the claim had arisen and earlier adjudication was incomplete.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421928</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>