https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302095 Conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was sustained where the evidence showed that the complainant had advanced money, the accused acknowledged receipt in the defence agreement, and the cheques were admitted, timely presented, and dishonoured for insufficiency of funds. The statutory notice was proved and the defence raised no effective rebuttal to the claim that the cheques were issued towards repayment of a legally enforceable liability. The plea that the cheques were only security cheques was rejected because it did not displace the documentary and oral evidence. The concurrent findings of the courts below were found free from illegality or infirmity, so no interference in revision was warranted. en-us Fri, 10 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 May 2022 20:56:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302095 Conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was sustained where the evidence showed that the complainant had advanced money, the accused acknowledged receipt in the defence agreement, and the cheques were admitted, timely presented, and dishonoured for insufficiency of funds. The statutory notice was proved and the defence raised no effective rebuttal to the claim that the cheques were issued towards repayment of a legally enforceable liability. The plea that the cheques were only security cheques was rejected because it did not displace the documentary and oral evidence. The concurrent findings of the courts below were found free from illegality or infirmity, so no interference in revision was warranted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302095