<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1891 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302095</link>
    <description>The court upheld the accused&#039;s conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring two cheques issued as repayment for a loan. The evidence presented, including testimonies, bank records, and legal notices, supported the conviction. The court rejected the defense that the cheques were security for a land sale agreement, emphasizing the accused&#039;s failure to repay the loan. Due to procedural non-compliance and the accused&#039;s conduct, the court dismissed the revision petition, affirming the conviction and directing the accused to serve the sentence without suspension.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 May 2022 20:56:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678126" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1891 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302095</link>
      <description>The court upheld the accused&#039;s conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring two cheques issued as repayment for a loan. The evidence presented, including testimonies, bank records, and legal notices, supported the conviction. The court rejected the defense that the cheques were security for a land sale agreement, emphasizing the accused&#039;s failure to repay the loan. Due to procedural non-compliance and the accused&#039;s conduct, the court dismissed the revision petition, affirming the conviction and directing the accused to serve the sentence without suspension.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302095</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>