<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 1342 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302102</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the review application, compounded the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, quashed the judgment of conviction and sentence, and acquitted the petitioner. The court directed the petitioner to pay an additional amount to the complainant for unnecessary litigation, with the deposited amount to be released to the complainant upon application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 May 2022 20:56:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 1342 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302102</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the review application, compounded the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, quashed the judgment of conviction and sentence, and acquitted the petitioner. The court directed the petitioner to pay an additional amount to the complainant for unnecessary litigation, with the deposited amount to be released to the complainant upon application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302102</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>