https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302081 The appellant's complaint was dismissed by the trial court due to the lack of legally recoverable debt under the cheque issued. The court found that there was no proper service of statutory notice on the respondent and that the cheque was issued as security, not for discharge of debt. Despite arguments regarding the presentation timeline of the cheque and burden of proof under Section 139 of the N.I. Act, the court upheld the trial court's order of acquittal, as the appellant failed to provide substantial documentary evidence. The appeal was ultimately dismissed. en-us Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 May 2022 10:37:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302081 The appellant's complaint was dismissed by the trial court due to the lack of legally recoverable debt under the cheque issued. The court found that there was no proper service of statutory notice on the respondent and that the cheque was issued as security, not for discharge of debt. Despite arguments regarding the presentation timeline of the cheque and burden of proof under Section 139 of the N.I. Act, the court upheld the trial court's order of acquittal, as the appellant failed to provide substantial documentary evidence. The appeal was ultimately dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302081