<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 168 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421908</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, condoning the delay in filing the appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) and restoring the matter to the first appellate authority for a decision on the merits. The judgment emphasized the importance of a balanced approach in considering delays in legal proceedings, prioritizing substantial justice and ensuring litigants&#039; rights to a fair hearing are upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 May 2022 08:32:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678059" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 168 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421908</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, condoning the delay in filing the appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) and restoring the matter to the first appellate authority for a decision on the merits. The judgment emphasized the importance of a balanced approach in considering delays in legal proceedings, prioritizing substantial justice and ensuring litigants&#039; rights to a fair hearing are upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421908</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>