<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 152 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421892</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting additions made by the Assessing Officer based on voluntary disclosure before the Settlement Commission and allowing the deduction of education cess. The judgment emphasized the requirement for incriminating evidence to support additions and upheld the deductibility of education cess, citing jurisdictional precedent and CBDT circulars.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 May 2022 20:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678037" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 152 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421892</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting additions made by the Assessing Officer based on voluntary disclosure before the Settlement Commission and allowing the deduction of education cess. The judgment emphasized the requirement for incriminating evidence to support additions and upheld the deductibility of education cess, citing jurisdictional precedent and CBDT circulars.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421892</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>