https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421876 The High Court allowed the petition seeking to quash the order directing payment of interim compensation under Section 143(A) of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Court found that the Trial Court had misinterpreted the provision as mandatory, failing to provide the petitioner with an opportunity to respond before passing the order. The High Court held that Section 143(A) is directory, not mandatory, and set aside the order, remanding the matter back to the Trial Court for reconsideration within one month. en-us Thu, 28 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 May 2022 09:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421876 The High Court allowed the petition seeking to quash the order directing payment of interim compensation under Section 143(A) of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Court found that the Trial Court had misinterpreted the provision as mandatory, failing to provide the petitioner with an opportunity to respond before passing the order. The High Court held that Section 143(A) is directory, not mandatory, and set aside the order, remanding the matter back to the Trial Court for reconsideration within one month. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 28 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421876