https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421875 The court allowed the compounding of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act following a compromise between the parties. The conviction and sentence imposed by the trial court and upheld by the appellate courts were quashed. Citing legal precedents, including judgments from the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad and the Supreme Court, the court exercised its powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to annul the conviction based on the compromise. As a result, the petitioner was acquitted, and the case was disposed of along with any pending applications. en-us Wed, 02 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 May 2022 15:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421875 The court allowed the compounding of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act following a compromise between the parties. The conviction and sentence imposed by the trial court and upheld by the appellate courts were quashed. Citing legal precedents, including judgments from the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad and the Supreme Court, the court exercised its powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to annul the conviction based on the compromise. As a result, the petitioner was acquitted, and the case was disposed of along with any pending applications. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 02 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421875