<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 134 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421874</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for the assessment year 2011-12, deleting the addition of Rs. 25,00,000 as unexplained cash loan. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for the assessment year 2014-15, upholding the deletion of Rs. 2,11,97,690 on account of unexplained expenditure. The judgments emphasized the need for corroborative evidence and the opportunity for cross-examination in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 May 2022 08:30:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678013" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 134 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421874</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for the assessment year 2011-12, deleting the addition of Rs. 25,00,000 as unexplained cash loan. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for the assessment year 2014-15, upholding the deletion of Rs. 2,11,97,690 on account of unexplained expenditure. The judgments emphasized the need for corroborative evidence and the opportunity for cross-examination in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421874</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>