https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302072 The Court allowed the recall of the judgment under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and the compounding of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. It held that the review petition was maintainable even after the withdrawal of the Special Leave Petition. The parties reached a settlement, leading to the quashing of the conviction and sentence, acquitting the petitioner. Additionally, the petitioner was directed to pay Rs. 50,000 to the respondent for litigation charges, with the amount deposited with the trial court to be released to the respondent upon application. en-us Fri, 01 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 May 2022 20:06:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302072 The Court allowed the recall of the judgment under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and the compounding of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. It held that the review petition was maintainable even after the withdrawal of the Special Leave Petition. The parties reached a settlement, leading to the quashing of the conviction and sentence, acquitting the petitioner. Additionally, the petitioner was directed to pay Rs. 50,000 to the respondent for litigation charges, with the amount deposited with the trial court to be released to the respondent upon application. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 01 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302072