<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1715 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302071</link>
    <description>A subsequent compromise and payment of the disputed amount supported recall of the earlier order dismissing the revision petition in a cheque dishonour matter. Relying on Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the Court noted that an offence under Section 138 can be compounded at any stage. On that basis, the earlier order was recalled, the conviction and sentence were set aside, and the accused was acquitted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 May 2022 20:06:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678005" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1715 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302071</link>
      <description>A subsequent compromise and payment of the disputed amount supported recall of the earlier order dismissing the revision petition in a cheque dishonour matter. Relying on Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the Court noted that an offence under Section 138 can be compounded at any stage. On that basis, the earlier order was recalled, the conviction and sentence were set aside, and the accused was acquitted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>