https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302078 The Court directed both parties to maintain the status quo regarding the impugned order under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, until the petitioner's appeal and stay application could be heard by the non-functional Appellate Tribunal. The respondents were restrained from taking any action against the petitioner based on the order during this period. The Court's order would merge with any future Tribunal decision on the appeal and stay application. The Court did not express any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's claim, and the petition was partly allowed for the purpose of staying the impugned order pending appeal. en-us Wed, 17 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 May 2022 20:06:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302078 The Court directed both parties to maintain the status quo regarding the impugned order under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, until the petitioner's appeal and stay application could be heard by the non-functional Appellate Tribunal. The respondents were restrained from taking any action against the petitioner based on the order during this period. The Court's order would merge with any future Tribunal decision on the appeal and stay application. The Court did not express any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's claim, and the petition was partly allowed for the purpose of staying the impugned order pending appeal. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 17 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302078