https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302079 Prosecution under Section 276C(2) of the Income-tax Act was not quashed because the claim that tax and interest had already been paid raised disputed questions of fact that had to be tested at trial. The pending compounding request did not justify interference with the criminal proceedings, though the competent authority was directed to consider it in accordance with law within the stipulated time. Limited dispensation was granted regarding the petitioners' appearance before the trial court, except at specified stages. The criminal original petition was dismissed. en-us Mon, 06 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 May 2022 20:06:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302079 Prosecution under Section 276C(2) of the Income-tax Act was not quashed because the claim that tax and interest had already been paid raised disputed questions of fact that had to be tested at trial. The pending compounding request did not justify interference with the criminal proceedings, though the competent authority was directed to consider it in accordance with law within the stipulated time. Limited dispensation was granted regarding the petitioners' appearance before the trial court, except at specified stages. The criminal original petition was dismissed. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 06 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302079