<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 118 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421858</link>
    <description>The court quashed the complaint in E.O.C.C.No.132 of 2019, finding that the prosecution was initiated without considering the payment of tax with interest, constituting non-application of mind and malicious prosecution. The petitions to quash the complaint were allowed, and the connected Miscellaneous Petitions were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2022 12:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=677906" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 118 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421858</link>
      <description>The court quashed the complaint in E.O.C.C.No.132 of 2019, finding that the prosecution was initiated without considering the payment of tax with interest, constituting non-application of mind and malicious prosecution. The petitions to quash the complaint were allowed, and the connected Miscellaneous Petitions were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421858</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>