<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 109 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421849</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the deletion of penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) due to the lack of specificity in the notice and the bonafide nature of errors in deductions. The tribunal emphasized the importance of demonstrating inadvertent errors and adhering to legal procedures in penalty proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 May 2022 08:23:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=677897" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 109 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421849</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the deletion of penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) due to the lack of specificity in the notice and the bonafide nature of errors in deductions. The tribunal emphasized the importance of demonstrating inadvertent errors and adhering to legal procedures in penalty proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421849</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>