<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (6) TMI 37 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28790</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the company on the issue of treating loans as debentures for section 80J relief, holding that the loans should be considered debentures. However, the court ruled against the assessee on the classification of interest income from bank deposits, determining that such income did not qualify as business income under section 80J. The court upheld relief for the loans treated as debentures but denied relief for interest income from bank deposits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:18:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67787" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (6) TMI 37 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28790</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the company on the issue of treating loans as debentures for section 80J relief, holding that the loans should be considered debentures. However, the court ruled against the assessee on the classification of interest income from bank deposits, determining that such income did not qualify as business income under section 80J. The court upheld relief for the loans treated as debentures but denied relief for interest income from bank deposits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28790</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>