<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 81 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , KOCHI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421821</link>
    <description>A liquidation claimant sought interference with the liquidator&#039;s assessment of claims, rejection of the admitted claims of others, and admission of his own belated claim. The Tribunal noted that similar objections had already been raised and dismissed in earlier proceedings, and that the liquidator had explained the basis of the claim assessment. It also relied on the applicant&#039;s status as a suspended director and shareholder, together with his lack of cooperation in the insolvency and liquidation process. On those facts, no basis was found to interfere with the liquidator&#039;s handling of claims or to grant the reliefs sought.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 May 2022 22:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=677867" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 81 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , KOCHI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421821</link>
      <description>A liquidation claimant sought interference with the liquidator&#039;s assessment of claims, rejection of the admitted claims of others, and admission of his own belated claim. The Tribunal noted that similar objections had already been raised and dismissed in earlier proceedings, and that the liquidator had explained the basis of the claim assessment. It also relied on the applicant&#039;s status as a suspended director and shareholder, together with his lack of cooperation in the insolvency and liquidation process. On those facts, no basis was found to interfere with the liquidator&#039;s handling of claims or to grant the reliefs sought.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421821</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>