<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (5) TMI 17 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28787</link>
    <description>The court addressed the interpretation of sections 187 and 188 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 concerning the assessment of a firm&#039;s income under different partnerships. In this case, the Tribunal determined that the scenario involving the dissolution of a firm due to a partner&#039;s death and the subsequent formation of a new firm constituted a succession rather than a change in constitution. The court, noting conflicting views, referred the matter to the Income-tax Tribunal to clarify the legal interpretation, aiming to align the High Court&#039;s understanding with prevailing legal principles. No costs were awarded due to the respondent&#039;s absence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 May 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:13:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67784" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (5) TMI 17 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28787</link>
      <description>The court addressed the interpretation of sections 187 and 188 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 concerning the assessment of a firm&#039;s income under different partnerships. In this case, the Tribunal determined that the scenario involving the dissolution of a firm due to a partner&#039;s death and the subsequent formation of a new firm constituted a succession rather than a change in constitution. The court, noting conflicting views, referred the matter to the Income-tax Tribunal to clarify the legal interpretation, aiming to align the High Court&#039;s understanding with prevailing legal principles. No costs were awarded due to the respondent&#039;s absence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 May 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28787</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>