<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 36 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421776</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the assessee concerning the disallowance under section 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act. The decision upheld the addition of Rs. 8,54,455 due to late payment of ESIC/PF contributions, citing precedents set by the Gujarat High Court that late deposits of such contributions are not eligible for deductions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 May 2022 08:42:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=677772" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 36 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421776</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the assessee concerning the disallowance under section 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act. The decision upheld the addition of Rs. 8,54,455 due to late payment of ESIC/PF contributions, citing precedents set by the Gujarat High Court that late deposits of such contributions are not eligible for deductions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421776</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>