<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (3) TMI 22 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28780</link>
    <description>The court ruled that dividend income on bonus shares held by the assessee&#039;s wife was not taxable under section 64(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for assessment years 1968-69 and 1969-70. The court emphasized that the legislation did not intend to tax income arising from accretions to assets transferred to family members. The court referred to previous decisions and held in favor of the assessee, directing the Commissioner to pay the costs of the reference to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:53:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67777" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (3) TMI 22 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28780</link>
      <description>The court ruled that dividend income on bonus shares held by the assessee&#039;s wife was not taxable under section 64(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for assessment years 1968-69 and 1969-70. The court emphasized that the legislation did not intend to tax income arising from accretions to assets transferred to family members. The court referred to previous decisions and held in favor of the assessee, directing the Commissioner to pay the costs of the reference to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28780</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>