<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 31 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421771</link>
    <description>A successive anticipatory bail petition was held not maintainable where no material change in circumstances was shown after an earlier refusal, and the accused had not cooperated with the investigation despite summons and notices. The court treated the continuing non-appearance before investigating authorities as a factor against exercising discretion in favour of bail, and the request for anticipatory bail was dismissed without relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 May 2022 08:42:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=677765" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 31 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421771</link>
      <description>A successive anticipatory bail petition was held not maintainable where no material change in circumstances was shown after an earlier refusal, and the accused had not cooperated with the investigation despite summons and notices. The court treated the continuing non-appearance before investigating authorities as a factor against exercising discretion in favour of bail, and the request for anticipatory bail was dismissed without relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421771</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>