<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 27 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421767</link>
    <description>The appeal centered on the rejection of a refund claim for Anti Dumping duty on PVC Resin import. The Court found the duty notification had expired, making no duty payable by the appellant. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, setting aside the initial rejection and directing the refund with interest. This decision clarified the validity of the duty notification and affirmed the appellant&#039;s entitlement to the refund based on the absence of duty obligation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 May 2022 08:42:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=677759" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 27 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421767</link>
      <description>The appeal centered on the rejection of a refund claim for Anti Dumping duty on PVC Resin import. The Court found the duty notification had expired, making no duty payable by the appellant. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, setting aside the initial rejection and directing the refund with interest. This decision clarified the validity of the duty notification and affirmed the appellant&#039;s entitlement to the refund based on the absence of duty obligation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>