<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 21 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421761</link>
    <description>When a liquidator incurs preservation or salvage expenses for a secured asset with the secured creditor&#039;s consent, and the creditor seeks to realise its security outside liquidation, those costs are not shifted to the liquidation estate; the creditor must bear the proportionate expense attributable to the benefit received. The tribunal also upheld litigation costs against the secured creditor where the appeal prolonged a dispute over reimbursement for expenses incurred for the creditor&#039;s benefit. The decision affirms that a secured creditor cannot enjoy asset protection during liquidation and simultaneously avoid the corresponding preservation and legal costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 May 2022 08:41:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=677751" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 21 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421761</link>
      <description>When a liquidator incurs preservation or salvage expenses for a secured asset with the secured creditor&#039;s consent, and the creditor seeks to realise its security outside liquidation, those costs are not shifted to the liquidation estate; the creditor must bear the proportionate expense attributable to the benefit received. The tribunal also upheld litigation costs against the secured creditor where the appeal prolonged a dispute over reimbursement for expenses incurred for the creditor&#039;s benefit. The decision affirms that a secured creditor cannot enjoy asset protection during liquidation and simultaneously avoid the corresponding preservation and legal costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421761</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>