<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Pink Duplicate Invoices Found in Factory; No Evidence of Double Transport or Payments.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=63204</link>
    <description>Clandestine removal - Invoices pink coloured [Duplicate for transporter] are found in factory, hence, it can also be inferred logically that goods were not transported out of factory against the said Invoices named as parallel Invoices in facts of this case. - There is no corroborative evidence of removal of goods twice on the same Invoice or on parallel Invoices and receiving payment twice for Invoices. It is found that except statements, there is nothing on record to establish Revenue’s case of clandestine manufacture or removal of goods from Appellant’s Factory, in the facts of this case. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2022 08:41:13 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 May 2022 08:41:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=677734" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Pink Duplicate Invoices Found in Factory; No Evidence of Double Transport or Payments.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=63204</link>
      <description>Clandestine removal - Invoices pink coloured [Duplicate for transporter] are found in factory, hence, it can also be inferred logically that goods were not transported out of factory against the said Invoices named as parallel Invoices in facts of this case. - There is no corroborative evidence of removal of goods twice on the same Invoice or on parallel Invoices and receiving payment twice for Invoices. It is found that except statements, there is nothing on record to establish Revenue’s case of clandestine manufacture or removal of goods from Appellant’s Factory, in the facts of this case. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2022 08:41:13 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=63204</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>