https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421741 Section 56 of the Rajasthan Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 was found unconstitutional to the extent it allowed legal representation for the applicant or appellant but not for the respondent in proceedings before the Appellate Tribunal, Regulatory Authority or adjudicating officer. The Court held that quasi-judicial participation must be available on equal terms to both sides, and that the exclusion of the respondent created an unjustified distinction contrary to equality and fair hearing principles. The provision was therefore read down so the respondent may also appear in person or authorise the same categories of representatives, preserving the statutory scheme through constitutional interpretation. en-us Fri, 04 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Apr 2022 20:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421741 Section 56 of the Rajasthan Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 was found unconstitutional to the extent it allowed legal representation for the applicant or appellant but not for the respondent in proceedings before the Appellate Tribunal, Regulatory Authority or adjudicating officer. The Court held that quasi-judicial participation must be available on equal terms to both sides, and that the exclusion of the respondent created an unjustified distinction contrary to equality and fair hearing principles. The provision was therefore read down so the respondent may also appear in person or authorise the same categories of representatives, preserving the statutory scheme through constitutional interpretation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 04 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421741