<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1631 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302037</link>
    <description>A proposed settlement covering only one respondent in a corporate insolvency resolution process for a housing project did not justify stopping the insolvency process or preventing constitution of the Committee of Creditors. The Interim Resolution Professional was directed to proceed with constitution of the Committee of Creditors and continue the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 May 2022 20:49:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=677725" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1631 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302037</link>
      <description>A proposed settlement covering only one respondent in a corporate insolvency resolution process for a housing project did not justify stopping the insolvency process or preventing constitution of the Committee of Creditors. The Interim Resolution Professional was directed to proceed with constitution of the Committee of Creditors and continue the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302037</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>