<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 2051 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302018</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, classifying the research and development expenses as revenue expenditure. The Tribunal emphasized that the expenses were incurred in the regular course of the existing business and did not result in the creation of a new asset. This decision overturned the CIT(A)&#039;s classification of the expenses as capital expenditure, based on the distinction between expenditures for ongoing business operations versus those for creating new assets.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2022 20:32:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=677714" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 2051 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302018</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, classifying the research and development expenses as revenue expenditure. The Tribunal emphasized that the expenses were incurred in the regular course of the existing business and did not result in the creation of a new asset. This decision overturned the CIT(A)&#039;s classification of the expenses as capital expenditure, based on the distinction between expenditures for ongoing business operations versus those for creating new assets.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302018</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>