https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421738 A suspension order was examined only on the limited question of whether interim interference was warranted pending departmental proceedings. The Court did not enter into the merits of the allegations, but balanced the pendency of the disciplinary inquiry against the request to revoke suspension. It granted conditional relief by directing that, if the inquiry was not concluded within the stipulated period and there was no allegation of non-cooperation by the employee, the suspension would cease to operate until the inquiry was completed. The suspension was not quashed outright, but its continuance was made dependent on timely completion of the disciplinary process. en-us Thu, 28 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Apr 2025 12:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421738 A suspension order was examined only on the limited question of whether interim interference was warranted pending departmental proceedings. The Court did not enter into the merits of the allegations, but balanced the pendency of the disciplinary inquiry against the request to revoke suspension. It granted conditional relief by directing that, if the inquiry was not concluded within the stipulated period and there was no allegation of non-cooperation by the employee, the suspension would cease to operate until the inquiry was completed. The suspension was not quashed outright, but its continuance was made dependent on timely completion of the disciplinary process. Case-Laws GST Thu, 28 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421738