<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 1401 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421735</link>
    <description>The HC allowed the appeal against cancellation of GST registration, finding the rejection of the appellant&#039;s revocation application violated natural justice principles. The appellant, an infrastructure company with nationwide operations, had their registration cancelled due to alleged non-functioning at the registered place of business. The court determined that the appellant appeared to be conducting legitimate business in West Bengal, and the respondent&#039;s rejection was arbitrary. The HC set aside the rejection order and directed the GST authority to reconsider the revocation application after allowing the appellant to present evidence of their business operations in the state.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2025 13:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=677656" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 1401 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421735</link>
      <description>The HC allowed the appeal against cancellation of GST registration, finding the rejection of the appellant&#039;s revocation application violated natural justice principles. The appellant, an infrastructure company with nationwide operations, had their registration cancelled due to alleged non-functioning at the registered place of business. The court determined that the appellant appeared to be conducting legitimate business in West Bengal, and the respondent&#039;s rejection was arbitrary. The HC set aside the rejection order and directed the GST authority to reconsider the revocation application after allowing the appellant to present evidence of their business operations in the state.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421735</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>