<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 1378 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421712</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer (AO) to verify the payment of stamp duty and registration charges. The Tribunal concluded that the AO had conducted detailed inquiries and considered the evidence before framing the assessment order. It found no error warranting proceedings under section 263, except for the verification of stamp duty payments. The judgment was pronounced on 13/04/2022 in Ahmedabad.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2022 08:10:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=677626" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 1378 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421712</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer (AO) to verify the payment of stamp duty and registration charges. The Tribunal concluded that the AO had conducted detailed inquiries and considered the evidence before framing the assessment order. It found no error warranting proceedings under section 263, except for the verification of stamp duty payments. The judgment was pronounced on 13/04/2022 in Ahmedabad.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421712</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>