https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421694 The appeal involved a sugar manufacturing company contesting duty demand and penalty for not maintaining separate records for press mud/compost under Rule 6 of CENVAT Credit Rules. The Member (Technical) relied on legal precedents to rule in favor of the appellants, stating that press mud during sugar manufacture does not fall under the scope of Rule 6. The decision set aside the duty demand and penalty imposed, providing relief to the appellants based on established legal principles and previous tribunal judgments. en-us Thu, 28 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Apr 2022 08:09:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421694 The appeal involved a sugar manufacturing company contesting duty demand and penalty for not maintaining separate records for press mud/compost under Rule 6 of CENVAT Credit Rules. The Member (Technical) relied on legal precedents to rule in favor of the appellants, stating that press mud during sugar manufacture does not fall under the scope of Rule 6. The decision set aside the duty demand and penalty imposed, providing relief to the appellants based on established legal principles and previous tribunal judgments. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 28 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421694