<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 1357 - CESTAT MUMBAI (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421691</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that insurance premiums paid for medi-claim facilities under VSS qualify as input services under Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Additionally, the Tribunal held that Cost Accounting Standard-4 (CAS-4) is applicable for determining eligibility for CENVAT credit even if goods are not captively consumed. The matter was directed to the Division Bench for further consideration, with the appellant entitled to avail CENVAT credit on service tax paid for insurance premiums under VSS.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2022 14:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=677594" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 1357 - CESTAT MUMBAI (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421691</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that insurance premiums paid for medi-claim facilities under VSS qualify as input services under Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Additionally, the Tribunal held that Cost Accounting Standard-4 (CAS-4) is applicable for determining eligibility for CENVAT credit even if goods are not captively consumed. The matter was directed to the Division Bench for further consideration, with the appellant entitled to avail CENVAT credit on service tax paid for insurance premiums under VSS.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421691</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>