<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 2256 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301997</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remitted the issue of whether the land sold was agricultural back to the Assessing Officer for proper consideration, allowing the appeal for statistical purposes. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of substantiating claims with evidence and fair consideration of relevant factors in tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2022 20:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=677583" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 2256 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301997</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remitted the issue of whether the land sold was agricultural back to the Assessing Officer for proper consideration, allowing the appeal for statistical purposes. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of substantiating claims with evidence and fair consideration of relevant factors in tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301997</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>