https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302002 The court disposed of all writ petitions, directing the respondents to maintain the petitioners as casual workers and pay them minimum wages as per the pre-2013 engagement standards. Regularization was not granted due to the absence of a formal policy. The judgment clarified that those engaged through outsourcing would not benefit from the decision. The respondents were instructed to consider the petitioners' employment as daily wage casual workers, ensuring equal pay to other department employees in similar roles. en-us Tue, 13 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Apr 2022 20:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302002 The court disposed of all writ petitions, directing the respondents to maintain the petitioners as casual workers and pay them minimum wages as per the pre-2013 engagement standards. Regularization was not granted due to the absence of a formal policy. The judgment clarified that those engaged through outsourcing would not benefit from the decision. The respondents were instructed to consider the petitioners' employment as daily wage casual workers, ensuring equal pay to other department employees in similar roles. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 13 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302002