https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421682 The court declined to condone the delay of 2575 days in filing the appeal, emphasizing the importance of adhering to limitation periods. It stressed the need for genuine and acceptable reasons for condonation of delay, cautioning against routine or mechanical condonation. The court highlighted the substantive nature of limitation laws and the balance between citizens' rights and duties. It rejected the imposition of heavy costs for delays, stating that justice should not be compromised. Ultimately, the appeal was dismissed at the SR stage, with no costs awarded. en-us Wed, 30 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Apr 2022 16:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421682 The court declined to condone the delay of 2575 days in filing the appeal, emphasizing the importance of adhering to limitation periods. It stressed the need for genuine and acceptable reasons for condonation of delay, cautioning against routine or mechanical condonation. The court highlighted the substantive nature of limitation laws and the balance between citizens' rights and duties. It rejected the imposition of heavy costs for delays, stating that justice should not be compromised. Ultimately, the appeal was dismissed at the SR stage, with no costs awarded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 30 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421682