https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301994 Order XXI Rule 84 CPC was construed to require resale "forthwith" in the sense of immediate action without unnecessary delay, but not to prohibit all practical flexibility. A resale held on the same day as an abortive auction was therefore not invalid merely for that reason, if conducted as expeditiously as the circumstances allowed. On the separate challenge under Order XXI Rule 90 CPC, no material irregularity in publishing or conducting the resale was proved; the factual findings that the earlier bid was not shown to be a genuine offer and that the resale was properly conducted were left undisturbed. The challenge to the sale accordingly failed. en-us Fri, 30 May 1975 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Apr 2022 18:46:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301994 Order XXI Rule 84 CPC was construed to require resale "forthwith" in the sense of immediate action without unnecessary delay, but not to prohibit all practical flexibility. A resale held on the same day as an abortive auction was therefore not invalid merely for that reason, if conducted as expeditiously as the circumstances allowed. On the separate challenge under Order XXI Rule 90 CPC, no material irregularity in publishing or conducting the resale was proved; the factual findings that the earlier bid was not shown to be a genuine offer and that the resale was properly conducted were left undisturbed. The challenge to the sale accordingly failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 30 May 1975 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301994