<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 1205 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301991</link>
    <description>Freight or delivery charges separately charged do not form part of turnover under the U.P. Trade Tax Act, but exclusion depends on proof that transportation consideration was separately agreed and actually paid. The contract here showed distinct supply and transportation components with separate rates, yet the decisive factual question remained whether the railway had in fact made separate payment for freight. The tribunal&#039;s order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication, with an opportunity to adduce evidence on separate payment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2022 15:37:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=677551" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 1205 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301991</link>
      <description>Freight or delivery charges separately charged do not form part of turnover under the U.P. Trade Tax Act, but exclusion depends on proof that transportation consideration was separately agreed and actually paid. The contract here showed distinct supply and transportation components with separate rates, yet the decisive factual question remained whether the railway had in fact made separate payment for freight. The tribunal&#039;s order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication, with an opportunity to adduce evidence on separate payment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301991</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>