<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 1341 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421675</link>
    <description>The AAR Gujarat classified a composite supply involving construction of school buildings, hostels, and staff quarters for the Government of Gujarat as qualifying for concessional GST rates under Serial Number 3(vi) of Notification 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate). The Authority held that since the recipient was the State Government acting as a public authority for educational purposes rather than commercial activities, and the structures were meant for educational establishments, the supply fell outside the purview of &quot;business&quot; as defined in the notification. Revenue&#039;s contention that the structures might be used for commercial purposes was rejected absent specific evidence, confirming the applicant&#039;s entitlement to the concessional rate classification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2025 14:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=677515" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 1341 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421675</link>
      <description>The AAR Gujarat classified a composite supply involving construction of school buildings, hostels, and staff quarters for the Government of Gujarat as qualifying for concessional GST rates under Serial Number 3(vi) of Notification 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate). The Authority held that since the recipient was the State Government acting as a public authority for educational purposes rather than commercial activities, and the structures were meant for educational establishments, the supply fell outside the purview of &quot;business&quot; as defined in the notification. Revenue&#039;s contention that the structures might be used for commercial purposes was rejected absent specific evidence, confirming the applicant&#039;s entitlement to the concessional rate classification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421675</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>