<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 1330 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421664</link>
    <description>The High Court accepted the appeal after condoning the delay in filing and re-filing. However, in the Income Tax Appeal challenging the ITAT order, the Court upheld the exclusion of certain companies as comparables, citing detailed reasons provided by the ITAT. The Court found no substantial question of law regarding the exclusion and dismissed the appeal, noting a previous similar case involving the same Appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2022 08:19:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=677500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 1330 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421664</link>
      <description>The High Court accepted the appeal after condoning the delay in filing and re-filing. However, in the Income Tax Appeal challenging the ITAT order, the Court upheld the exclusion of certain companies as comparables, citing detailed reasons provided by the ITAT. The Court found no substantial question of law regarding the exclusion and dismissed the appeal, noting a previous similar case involving the same Appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421664</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>