<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 1321 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421655</link>
    <description>The High Court analyzed issues regarding reliance on statements under Section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act, the need for corroborative evidence for additions based on such statements, and the treatment of retracted statements. Emphasizing the importance of proper evidentiary value, the Court ruled in favor of the revenue, dismissing the appeal without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2022 22:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=677489" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 1321 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421655</link>
      <description>The High Court analyzed issues regarding reliance on statements under Section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act, the need for corroborative evidence for additions based on such statements, and the treatment of retracted statements. Emphasizing the importance of proper evidentiary value, the Court ruled in favor of the revenue, dismissing the appeal without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421655</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>