<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 1319 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421653</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039; decision regarding the validity of scrutiny selection for complete scrutiny due to unexplained loans. Regarding the addition of unexplained cash credits under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, the Tribunal directed the deletion of the addition for certain transactions while confirming it for others. The appeal was partly allowed, adjusting the addition accordingly, based on the evidence provided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2022 22:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=677487" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 1319 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421653</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039; decision regarding the validity of scrutiny selection for complete scrutiny due to unexplained loans. Regarding the addition of unexplained cash credits under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, the Tribunal directed the deletion of the addition for certain transactions while confirming it for others. The appeal was partly allowed, adjusting the addition accordingly, based on the evidence provided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421653</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>