<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (3) TMI 17 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28749</link>
    <description>Legal expenses incurred in defending suits touching the management and application of business funds are deductible where the litigation is incidental to the trade and affects the carrying on of the business as a going concern. The decisive distinction is between expenditure made to protect the business from disputes over its conduct and expenditure aimed at acquiring, curing, or safeguarding capital rights. On the facts described, allegations of mismanagement, dissipation of assets, and breach of contract relating to shareholding were intrinsically connected with business operations, so the expenses were revenue in character and allowable as business expenditure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:46:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67746" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (3) TMI 17 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28749</link>
      <description>Legal expenses incurred in defending suits touching the management and application of business funds are deductible where the litigation is incidental to the trade and affects the carrying on of the business as a going concern. The decisive distinction is between expenditure made to protect the business from disputes over its conduct and expenditure aimed at acquiring, curing, or safeguarding capital rights. On the facts described, allegations of mismanagement, dissipation of assets, and breach of contract relating to shareholding were intrinsically connected with business operations, so the expenses were revenue in character and allowable as business expenditure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28749</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>