<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (12) TMI 41 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28747</link>
    <description>Business expenditure is allowable where it is incurred on grounds of commercial expediency and in accordance with ordinary commercial practice, even if it also benefits another person. On that test, the Rs. 4,800 item was disallowed because no nexus with the assessee&#039;s business was shown during the relevant year. The brokerage of Rs. 12,785 and travelling allowance of Rs. 1,500 were treated as allowable, because they were connected with the managed company&#039;s expansion and procurement activities, and the assessee&#039;s remuneration depended on the managed company&#039;s profits. The fact that those expenses might have been capital in the managed company&#039;s hands did not make them capital expenditure for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:43:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67744" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (12) TMI 41 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28747</link>
      <description>Business expenditure is allowable where it is incurred on grounds of commercial expediency and in accordance with ordinary commercial practice, even if it also benefits another person. On that test, the Rs. 4,800 item was disallowed because no nexus with the assessee&#039;s business was shown during the relevant year. The brokerage of Rs. 12,785 and travelling allowance of Rs. 1,500 were treated as allowable, because they were connected with the managed company&#039;s expansion and procurement activities, and the assessee&#039;s remuneration depended on the managed company&#039;s profits. The fact that those expenses might have been capital in the managed company&#039;s hands did not make them capital expenditure for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28747</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>