<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 1278 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421612</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for the assessment years 2013-14 to 2017-18, quashing the AO&#039;s orders under Sections 201(1)/201(1A) as time-barred and on merits. It held that Common Area Maintenance (CAM) charges should be subject to TDS at 2% under Section 194C, not at 10% under Section 194I. Consequently, the levy of interest under Section 201(1A) was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 16:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=677387" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 1278 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421612</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for the assessment years 2013-14 to 2017-18, quashing the AO&#039;s orders under Sections 201(1)/201(1A) as time-barred and on merits. It held that Common Area Maintenance (CAM) charges should be subject to TDS at 2% under Section 194C, not at 10% under Section 194I. Consequently, the levy of interest under Section 201(1A) was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421612</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>